boot0sio working for anyone?
uspoerlein at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 10:28:52 UTC 2008
On Fri, 08.02.2008 at 13:12:43 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> > Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> >> So, is boot0sio supposed to just work with a cheap USB->RS232 dongle at
> >> the other end? I don't know how this paragraph from boot0cfg(8) is
> >> affecting me.
> > boot0sio is wholly dependent upon BIOS support for addressing the on-board
> > COM1 port. It is not intended (read: very unlikely) to work with USB
> > dongles.
> > If your BIOS does not support the call that it uses, then the symptoms will
> > be similar to what you've seen. Unfortunately there is just not enough
> > space in the MBR to implement any workarounds for this.
> Yeah, unless the BIOS provides traditional SIO emulation via USB (similar
> idea to providing tradition AT keyboard emulation via USB)
> then boot0sio won't work. It's not very feasible to put a USB
> stack into the early boot loader anyways. It's somewhat possible
> (at least, using a chained boot loader), but not very feasible.
Erm, you guys got that one wrong. boot0sio is running on a machine
without USB! It is the *other end* of the line (my laptop) where
I'm using tip(1) on /dev/cuaU0. And I'm not sure if this provides the
necessary signals to boot0sio to start working.
So, to recap the question: Is boot0sio working with 9600 or 115200 baud
for anyone on 8-CURRENT (and built with gcc 4.x)?
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool,
than to speak, and remove all doubt.
More information about the freebsd-current