Symbol versioning errors in libthr

Dag-Erling Smørgrav des at
Mon Feb 4 17:04:40 UTC 2008

Daniel Eischen <deischen at> writes:
> I question the bumping of FBSDprivate to 1.1.  FBSDprivate is special,
> it is only for use in our base system, and our supported method of
> updating our system is buildworkd/buildkernel - so any changes to
> FBSDprivate should be unnoticed.

A whole lot of assumptions there.  Bumping FBSDprivate costs nothing and
might save our a***s down the road if one of those assumptions turn out
to be false.

(unless you can show that it's actually harmful in some way?)

Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list