Symbol versioning errors in libthr
des at des.no
Mon Feb 4 17:04:40 UTC 2008
Daniel Eischen <deischen at freebsd.org> writes:
> I question the bumping of FBSDprivate to 1.1. FBSDprivate is special,
> it is only for use in our base system, and our supported method of
> updating our system is buildworkd/buildkernel - so any changes to
> FBSDprivate should be unnoticed.
A whole lot of assumptions there. Bumping FBSDprivate costs nothing and
might save our a***s down the road if one of those assumptions turn out
to be false.
(unless you can show that it's actually harmful in some way?)
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the freebsd-current