Change select(2) to kevent(2) on script(1)...
nork at FreeBSD.org
Tue Dec 23 11:19:47 UTC 2008
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:57:38 -0800
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > I think that performance improvement is significant(I don't
> > think performance improved by my patch). But my patch is the
> And can you explain where that "significant improvement" comes from? Are
> you saying that tty layer / pseudo-terminal driver is somehow much more
> efficient with kqeue(2) compared to select(2)/poll(2)? There is
> something broken about it if so.
> In any case without any numbers this discussion is pretty much pointless.
I'm sorry. My "significant" means is "important". I missed
I consider that:
1. on select(2) v.s. kqueue(2) in this case, not
2. both select(2) and kqueue(2) are not broken.
I'm interesting in implementation of script(1) by kqueue(2).
More information about the freebsd-current