kmacy at freebsd.org
Sun Aug 24 04:39:36 UTC 2008
There really isn't any magic to bringing up a port. You compile it,
install it, and then run it until it breaks. Once it breaks you spend
a lot of time instrumenting the code to track down what went wrong.
Then, depending on the amount of technical insight you have in to the
issue, you go through a number of iterations until it is fixed. Fixing
the pmap issue is "just" (notice the quotes) a matter of tracking down
the missing TLB shootdowns. For anyone who chooses pick this up it
will be very educational. It will also be very time consuming.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Peter Jeremy
<peterjeremy at optushome.com.au> wrote:
> On 2008-Aug-23 22:40:55 -0500, Mark Linimon <linimon at lonesome.com> wrote:
>>My understanding is the the port is in a pre-alpha state due to unfinished
>>work in the kernel, so expecting there to be any userbase is premature.
> Except that the wiki gives a far more optimistic picture.
>>All of our 'new' architectures which are in this state have so few non-
>>developer users that there is hardly any reason to submit PRs. AFAICT
>>the active developers already know what's missing :-)
> That makes it very difficult for someone outside that group to come up
> to speed. I can't find anything in the freebsd-sun4v archvies. I was
> hoping that there would be a list somewhere of what state various
> subsystems were in and what remained to be done. wiki.freebsd.org
> sounds like the ideal place for this.
> On 2008-Aug-23 20:39:29 -0700, Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>Maybe some time should be spent looking at stuff from NetBSD to see
>>whether or not they've solved some already critical porting pieces
>>that FreeBSD lacks in this architecture?
> I can't find anything that suggests NetBSD runs on sun4v. Their sparc64
> port only covers the US-I/II families and there's no mention of sun4v.
> Peter Jeremy
> Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
> an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
More information about the freebsd-current