cpuctl(formely devcpu) patch test request
stas at FreeBSD.org
Tue Aug 5 13:11:24 UTC 2008
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:04:09 +0300
Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> mentioned:
> I noted cpucontrol(8) only after trying to import the rev5 patch.
> I do not suggest changing it, but what are the reasons for the microcode
> patch headers definitions to be private for the cpucontrol, instead of
> being put into the machine/<somefile>.h ?
I don't think it'll be generally useful. It's just a format
that vendors use to distribute firmware. Furthermore, it's
only documented by intel.
If something else will requres it, we can always move these
definitions to appropriate header files.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20080805/3bc3aca1/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current