cpuctl(formely devcpu) patch test request
stas at FreeBSD.org
Tue Aug 5 10:20:07 UTC 2008
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:42:41 -0400
Coleman Kane <cokane at FreeBSD.org> mentioned:
> Is it potentially "unsafe" to use RDMSR?
Well, it might disclose some sensitive information,
as well as create covert channels. E.g. some of the
registers contains kernel thread pointers, etc; some
of them undocumented. It won't be very wise to give
access to the rdmsr feature to all users on a
Sorry for this taking so long. You messages spotted
a bug in my security model for this driver, so I've
redone that. Now, the access to the rdmsr and cpuid
features will be granted only if the caller has
read permissions on the device, and wrmsr/update
- only if he've opened the device for writing.
This way you can provide fine-grained control to
the driver features.
I've also added the cpucontrol utility which provided
userland accesss to the driver, and allows to apply
The latest patch against HEAD is available here:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20080805/ebaa5c02/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current