The safety expansion for FreeBSD rm(1)
Brooks Davis
brooks at freebsd.org
Tue Sep 25 11:43:21 PDT 2007
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:58:37PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote:
> Hi Guys again
>
> Today is not unionfs. Introduction for safety expansion of rm(1).
> I know that some unix folks have a experience that you remove some
> files or directories accidentally. Yes, me too. LoL
>
> Have you any dreams that rm(1) autonomously judges target should
> be remove or not? To complexify system base command is objectionable
> behavior but adding some little and simple mechanism to prevent a
> issue is acceptable I suppose.
>
> We have created safety expansion for rm(1). If you have any interests,
> please try follow patch.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/safety-rm/
>
> Thanks :)
This seems like an interesting extension of rm(1) in a fairly harmless manner.
It seems like a fairly logical extension of the tcsh rmstar variable. The
one concern I would have with it is that unlike the rmstar variable, it would
always run even if the rm command is run in a script.
What do you think of adding a flag to enable this behavior so users
could make rm an alias that uses the flag? That would keep it from
effecting scripts.
-- Brooks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20070925/b587ae7f/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list