The safety expansion for FreeBSD rm(1)

Brooks Davis brooks at freebsd.org
Tue Sep 25 11:43:21 PDT 2007


On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:58:37PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote:
>  Hi Guys again
> 
>  Today is not unionfs. Introduction for safety expansion of rm(1).
>  I know that some unix folks have a experience that you remove some
>  files or directories accidentally. Yes, me too. LoL
> 
>  Have you any dreams that rm(1) autonomously judges target should
>  be remove or not?  To complexify system base command is objectionable
>  behavior but adding some little and simple mechanism to prevent a
>  issue is acceptable I suppose.
> 
>  We have created safety expansion for rm(1). If you have any interests,
>  please try follow patch.
> 
>    http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/safety-rm/
> 
>  Thanks :)

This seems like an interesting extension of rm(1) in a fairly harmless manner.
It seems like a fairly logical extension of the tcsh rmstar variable.  The
one concern I would have with it is that unlike the rmstar variable, it would
always run even if the rm command is run in a script.

What do you think of adding a flag to enable this behavior so users
could make rm an alias that uses the flag?  That would keep it from
effecting scripts.

-- Brooks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20070925/b587ae7f/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list