SCHED_ULE on desktop system

[Roman Bogorodskiy]

  Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:

>   Jeff Roberson wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > 
> >>  Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >> 
> >>> This is contrary to the experiences of many others.  Can you send me your
> >>> dmesg?  There may be something about your particular hardware that is
> >>> triggering a bug.  ULE is definitely designed to be responsive on the
> >>> desktop.
> >> 
> >> Thanks for the quick answer!
> >> 
> >> Here's my dmesg: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/misc/dmesg.txt
> > 
> > Roman,
> > 
> > The enclosed patch helps things on my system, however, there are still some 
> > delays due to IO issues.  Let me know if this helps.
> 
> This patch seems to make my system react faster. However I need some
> time to test it more carefully.

It looks like it's not really so, it's still very slow under load. :(
 
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
> > 
> >> 
> >> Roman Bogorodskiy
> >> 
> 
> 
> Roman Bogorodskiy


Roman Bogorodskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20070917/e96b599d/attachment.pgp