Is it possible to debug an AMD kernel on Intel

Kip Macy kip.macy at gmail.com
Mon Nov 26 10:58:11 PST 2007


On Nov 26, 2007 10:05 AM, David O'Brien <obrien at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:32:13PM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
> > Also can we do what the rest of the world does and refer to it as
> > x86_64 or 64-bit intel? Continuing to refer to it as amd (I know they
> > came up with instruction set extensions but its now a fundamental part
> > of the x86 ISA) only serves to confuse new users.
>
> NO.  AMD pioneered this platform.  Without them we'd all be unhappily
> headed towards IA64's.  It is Intel that has constantly chosen to confuse
> its customers.  This is not a problem for The FreeBSD Project to fix.


Yes David, we do owe AMD a debt of thanks for accelerating the death
of ia64. But I have to burst your bubble. They are EXTENSIONS to
32-bit Intel not a new ISA. And conservative extensions at that.

I'm not advocating we change the name of the architecture in the tree,
but we are in a small minority in using AMD instead of x86_64 or
64-bit intel. In the future I'll remember to re-direct all "Can I run
an amd64 kernel on an Intel processor?" questions to you. And if you
don't answer promptly I'll give them my opinion on things.

 Cheers,
 Kip


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list