Tinderbox

John Merryweather Cooper john_m_cooper at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 20 07:35:50 PST 2007


Could not -fno-strict-aliasing be considered as just another WARN level?  At least then, there might be some pressure to eliminate strict aliasing warnings as a necessary component to moving to a higher WARN level.

jmc

----- Original Message ----
From: David O'Brien <obrien at freebsd.org>
To: John Birrell <jb at what-creek.com>
Cc: ????????? Bill Hacker <askbill at conducive.net>; freebsd-current at freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 7:20:28 AM
Subject: Re: Tinderbox


On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:33:50PM +0000, John Birrell wrote:
> Unfortunately the tinderboxes run with custom CFLAGS.
> I would change this if I could, but I'm not the first to mention
> how frustrating it is. I have never seen a good argument for why
> the tinderbox is different from the CVS defaults.

One reason is that some of us (at least) have dreams of not compiling
with -strict-aliasing.  If we have any hope of doing so - the tenderbox
needs to build without to keep new warnings of creaping up.

-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"





More information about the freebsd-current mailing list