No libc shared lib number bump ?

[John Baldwin]

On Friday 09 November 2007 01:59:45 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
> I'm pretty sure there will be future version bumps despite the assurances of
> the "symbol versioning cabal" that there won't be.
> So I think it should be left at 7 to allow that to happen in the future.

I'm not "pretty sure", but I think it would be best to just leave things as 
they are just in case.  Regarding the suggestion about 0.1, etc. the lack of 
minor numbers is something at least some tools assume IIRC, so it's probably 
best if we avoid it.

-- 
John Baldwin