No libc shared lib number bump ?

Daniel Eischen deischen at
Fri Nov 9 07:05:53 PST 2007

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote:

> Quoting Daniel Eischen <deischen at> (Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:43:46 -0400 (EDT)):
>> (*) libc and other symbol versioned libraries may be bumped
>> again in 8.0 to reset the numbering scheme back to 0 (
>> It was deemed to late in the game to do this for 7.0.
> I'm curious, why do we need to reset it back to .0?

We don't have to.  It would just make things clearer to have all
versioned symbol libraries with the same version number since
they shouldn't ever have to be bumped again.  Solaris has all
their libraries at .1.  We've already used .1, but .0 has never
been used.  obrien suggested it, and it seems to make sense
to me.


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list