conversion of an installed base i386 -> amd64
韓家標 Bill Hacker
askbill at conducive.net
Tue Nov 6 11:56:48 PST 2007
Chuck Robey wrote:
> I have finally decided that I really should have installed my
> quad-core-2 equipped box as a amd64, instead of the i386 (32 bit should
> have been 64 bit). I just finished a buildworld, and I checked, the
> binaries (which I haven't yet done an installworld on) are actually
> amd64/64 bit binaries. I'm running -current, which is mostly why I;m on
> this list, but my question is one of installation order: in doing the
> conversion, I don't really like the idea of accidentally hanging the
> box. I would like someone to please let me know, what's next?
> Understand, I am still running the i386 compiler (but the buildworld
> builds it's own private compiler, thank you very much). I need to know,
> should I install the world next? Or, is there some more correct
> strategy to get the kernel built?
> Understand, I'm running a 3ware raid, and while I got that in position,
> to make me feel really safe, i installed the system first in a
> junk-pile EIDE drive I happened to have laying about, so I actually do
> have a emergency drive I can quite easily boot from, if some disaster
> happens. I've tried it, it serves me as a very safe backup right now.
> So, I don't need to worry TOO MUCH about a disaster, but I would like to
> avoid it as much as I could anyhow.
Not really much to worry about so long as the box is within physical reach.
A Core-2 Quad with decent RAM complement builds <whatever> fast enough that
multiple installs and rebuilds in the same day are nearly painless.
What you might want to do is keep a local backup copy of the sources and ports,
rotate & refresh that periodically so you are not at the mercy of your net link
or potentially heavily-loaded mirrors to go forward, backwards, or 'sideways'.
More information about the freebsd-current