[ANNOUNCEMENT] Wiki for discussing P35/IHC9(R)/SATA issues set
韓家標 Bill Hacker
askbill at conducive.net
Tue Nov 6 07:40:59 PST 2007
Rusty Nejdl wrote:
>> Does SATA300, but has the same "feature" as the OP's Seagate drive:
>> a small jumper that limits the drive to SATA150 unless removed.
>> See below PDF.
> Thanks! Like Aryeh, I missed the jumper. I'll test this out tonight when
> I get home.
BTW - in a recent test of 2.5" high-capacity HDD, it was noted that SATA
required significantly more power than PATA. Well 'significant' to a laptop on
Given that single-drive setups seldom stress even UDMA 133 over the course of
reasonable time spans, does anyone know if:
A) SATA 300 needs yet-again more power than SATA 150?
B) running down-shifted to SATA 150 might actually be a better plan anyway in
Easier to maintain data integrity comes to mind as well as power budget.
More information about the freebsd-current