socklen_t (Re: Multicast problems [PATCH])
Harti Brandt
hartmut.brandt at dlr.de
Wed Jun 20 12:59:10 UTC 2007
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Daniel Eischen wrote:
DE>On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
DE>
DE>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:36:39PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
DE>>
DE>> > POSIX states that:
DE>> >
DE>> > o The <sys/socket.h> header shall define the type socklen_t,
DE>> > which is an integer type of width of at least 32 bits; see
DE>> > APPLICATION USAGE.
DE>> >
DE>> > and goes on to state:
DE>> >
DE>> > o The <sys/socket.h> header shall define the unsigned integer
DE>> > type sa_family_t.
DE>> >
DE>> > This seems to imply that our socklen_t should not be an unsigned
DE>> > integer (uint32_t), but a signed integer. In APPLICATION USAGE,
DE>> > POSIX states:
DE>>
DE>> I don't understand how you come to that conclusion. Why does not
DE>> mentioning whether socklen_t is signed or unsigned imply it should be
DE>> signed?
DE>
DE>Because it explicitly says unsigned for sa_family_t and does not
DE>say unsigned for socklen_t. To me, "integer" means a C (signed)
DE>integer. The fact that older APIs and implementations used "int"
DE>might support the argument to use int32_t just for compatibility
DE>reasons. As it stands now, portable code has to have some sort
DE>of autoconfig to determine whether or not to use socklen_t or int.
DE>I don't see how you can do this with #ifdefs unless you know
DE>OS version numbers and when socklen_t first got introduced.
In standardese stating 'integer type' means any integer type. It does not
imply signed or unsignedness. You might look at paragraph 14 of 6.2.5 of
the C standard: "The type char, the signed and unsigned integer types, and
the enumerated types are collectively called integer types."
DE> DE>> > To forestall portability problems, it is recommended that
DE>> > applications not use values larger than 23^1 -1 for the
DE>> > socklen_t type.
DE>>
DE>> That just means that those values will wrap to negative values if
DE>> socklen_t is a signed integer type.
It ensures that the code works whether the type is signed or unsigned.
harti
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list