fts(3) patch for review
Tim Kientzle
kientzle at freebsd.org
Wed Jun 20 06:31:03 UTC 2007
>>>>- for things that should be at least 64 bits wide, use long long
>>>> and not int64_t, as the latter is an optional type.
>>>
>>>Isn't "long long" a gcc-ism, whereas int64's are portable....
>>
>>'long long' is part of C99 and was widely supported by many compilers even
>>before C99 was approved. int64_t is also part of C99. ....
>
> ... the only mandatory <stdint.h> types are intmax_t and uintmax_t while
> all the [u]intN_t types are declared optional by C99.
So why not use intmax_t?
Tim Kientzle
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list