KTR and SCTP
Randall Stewart
rrs at cisco.com
Thu Jun 14 12:00:56 UTC 2007
Attilio Rao wrote:
> Randall Stewart wrote:
>
>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:23:31PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote:
>>>
>>>> All:
>>>>
>>>> I am in the process of converting all the logging that
>>>> SCTP does to use the KTR sub-system. This will fit
>>>> nicely.. I still need to do some things to make it
>>>> so I can pull out the logs and make pretty charts and
>>>> graphs (in SCTP its used for debugging but also exploring
>>>> how CC and other niceties works)..
>>>>
>>>> But I was wondering.. would anyone mind if I took
>>>> KTR_SPARE2
>>>>
>>>> and made it:
>>>>
>>>> KTR_SCTP_SUBSYS
>>>>
>>>> I have a huge amount of tracing under SCTP now.. so
>>>> many I am setting in a seperate mask set to enable/disable
>>>> various pieces of it.. So I was thinking it would
>>>> warrent a sub-system of its own :-D
>>>>
>>>> Any objections? If not I will change it :-D
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, we really do need to keep those spare fields for local use.
>>>
>>> Kris
>>>
>> Ok.. so I will just use
>>
>> KTR_SPARE2
>
>
> KTR_SCTP would not be more appropriate?
>
> Attilio
>
I internally had already done the
#define SCTP_SUBSYS_KTR XXXXX
so I can change it to whatever is appropriate...
Of course when some enables the SCTP one it should be
interesting to clash this against other sub-sys's.
The SCTP on can (and is) used by researchers to be able
to generate charts and graphs on cwnd algorithms.. and performance
in various ways... thats why I thought a spare one would be
more appropriate... but I can roll with the flow :-D
If I get the scrubber programs in good enough shape I need
to commit them into the test directory....
You can generate some really cool charts with it :-D
R
--
Randall Stewart
NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc.
803-345-0369 <or> 803-317-4952 (cell)
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list