/boot/mbr miscompiled?

[Pav Lucistnik]

Warren Block píše v st 06. 06. 2007 v 11:48 -0600:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> 
> >> Hmm.  The documentation bug was introduced recently in rev. 1.30
> >> of boot0cfg.8 (and merged into RELENG_6).  I've just checked on
> >> 4.x, 6.x, and 7.0 systems here, and /boot/mbr could never be
> >> accepted by boot0cfg(8) because the second signature (the "Drive"
> >> string) isn't there.  I've Cc:ed the committer of this change.
> >
> > And then, trust PRs. I wonder how is it possible that PR got submitted,
> > if the example showed in it is totally bogus? Escapes me.
> >
> > So, should I back out that rev.?
> 
> Crap.  Incorrect notes on my part, apparently from switching between 
> boot0cfg and fdisk.  Attached is a patch.  My apologies.

Okay, committed.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

East or west, ~ is best.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20070606/957c846d/attachment.pgp