nfe(4) vs. nve(4)
Ivan Voras
ivoras at fer.hr
Sun Jun 3 21:37:20 UTC 2007
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Shigeaki Tagashira and I had been working on enhancing nfe(4) for
> several months. Now I think we'got stable working nfe(4) and it's time
> to supesede nve(4) with the overhauled nfe(4) before branching to 7.
Please do, my on-board NIC is finally working with your new source!
nfe0: <NVIDIA nForce MCP55 Networking Adapter> port 0xc400-0xc407 mem
0xfe02b000-0xfe02bfff,0xfe02a000-0xfe02a0ff,0xfe029000-0xfe02900f irq 22
at device 8.0 on pci0
miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0
e1000phy0: <Marvell 88E1116 Gigabit PHY> PHY 0 on miibus1
e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX,
1000baseTX-FDX, auto
nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:50:8d:95:b3:5d
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: [FILTER]
nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu
1500 options=19b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
ether 00:50:8d:95:b3:5d
inet 10.0.0.100 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex,flag0,flag1>)
status: active
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list