Call for testers, significant sched_lock patch.
Jeff Roberson
jroberson at chesapeake.net
Fri Jun 1 06:37:08 UTC 2007
I am going to commit a patch that goes significantly towards decomposing
the scheduler lock into per-cpu scheduler locks. Before this, I would
like it if a few more people would run it under more circumstances than I
have. The patch is available at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/threadlock.diff
So far Kris Kennaway and myself have tested it fairly thoroughly on amd64
machines with 1-8 processors. We've mainly done various benchmarks as
well as Peter Holm's stress2 suite. It has survived our testing so this
isn't totally unstable code. I would like it if more people would test
on any other architecture you have available. I have also tested with
4BSD and ULE with and without INVARIANTS and WITNESS.
This patch should have 0 or almost 0 effect on performance. It sets the
stage for a drop-in replacement for ULE that has per-cpu run queue locks.
That scheduler has a sometimes dramatic effect on performance, depending
on the workload. I'm mostly looking for regressions here and not any
particular perf impact.
Any questions on the design of the approach should be directed at the
arch@ topics on the subject.
Thanks,
Jeff
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list