call for ALTQ users

[OutBackDingo]

Sounds exactly like what we do, multiple queues on bonded high speed
10G interfaces


On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:53:36 -0700
"Kip Macy" <kip.macy at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/28/07, Alexey Karagodov <karagodov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > how can i help you?
> 
> I'd like to understand how ALTQ is being used currently. Are there
> users using it on high bandwidth interfaces?
> 
> As currently implemented it would force serialization, increased
> locking overhead, and potentially loss of locality on cards that
> support multiple queues (i.e. most 10GigE cards).
> 
>      -Kip
> 
> >
> > 2007/7/29, Kip Macy <kip.macy at gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Expanding the net a bit.
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Kip Macy <kip.macy at gmail.com>
> > > Date: Jul 28, 2007 2:03 PM
> > > Subject: call for ALTQ users
> > > To: freebsd-net <freebsd-net at freebsd.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm looking at extending ifnet to support multiple tx queues. It
> > > appears that this will inevitably interact with ALTQ. I don't know
> > > anyone using ALTQ so I need users to raise their hands to
> > > eventually test prospective changes.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >        -Kip
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@
> > freebsd.org"
> > >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"