Call for non i386/amd64 testers for tmpfs

[Maxim Sobolev]

Regression test (t_mount) fails on PowerPC-based Mac:

+ echo     Root directory attributes are set correctly...
     Root directory attributes are set correctly...
+ test_mount -o uid=1000,gid=100,mode=755
+ mkdir /usr/src/tools/regression/tmpfs/tmp
+ [ 2 -gt 0 ]
+ mount -t tmpfs -o uid=1000,gid=100,mode=755 tmpfs 
/usr/src/tools/regression/tmpfs/tmp
+ cd /usr/src/tools/regression/tmpfs/tmp
+ stat -s /usr/src/tools/regression/tmpfs/tmp
+ eval st_dev=134283018 st_ino=2 st_mode=040000 st_nlink=2 st_uid=1000 
st_gid=100 st_rdev=4294967295 st_size=0 st_atime=1185399883 
st_mtime=1185399883 st_ctime=1185399883 st_birthtime=1185399883 
st_blksize=4096 st_blocks=0 st_flags=0
+ st_dev=134283018 st_ino=2 st_mode=040000 st_nlink=2 st_uid=1000 
st_gid=100 st_rdev=4294967295 st_size=0 st_atime=1185399883 
st_mtime=1185399883 st_ctime=1185399883 st_birthtime=1185399883 
st_blksize=4096 st_blocks=0 st_flags=0
+ [ 1000 = 1000 ]
+ [ 100 = 100 ]
+ [ 040000 = 040755 ]
+ die

Other tests complete just fine. I needed to hack t_vnd to avoid placing 
BSD label on md(4) disk image since BSD labels are not portable across 
different platforms so that GEOM_LABEL doesn't pick it up properly.

-Maxim

Xin LI wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to request that some owners of non-i386/amd64 boxes to test 
> sys/modules/tmpfs and report if it would work correctly on other 
> architectures, so I will be able to determine if it is appropriate to 
> connect it to build on these architectures (and perhaps pick out more 
> bugs :)
> 
> Thanks for your cooperation!
> 
> Cheers,
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> 
>