ZFS vs Samba Debugging Results ... Need Help.

[Brian Donnell]

I have the exact same configs enabled.  I have 2 gigs of RAM running a Core
2 Duo and tried with both default sysctls and with the loader/sysctls
recommended in the ZFS Tuning Guide (
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide) and it crashes in both cases.
The only difference I can tell between our
two setups is AMD64 vs i386.  That makes me think it's a problem with how
ZFS is being handled.  But if recompiling samba with gcc 4.2.1 got things
working for you, and Pascal Hofstee's debug info, I'm no longer sure if it's
a bug with ZFS or with samba3.

-- Brian

On 7/4/07, Boris S. <bst2006 at dva.dyndns.org> wrote:
>
> Brian Donnell schrieb:
> > It looks like it might be another AMD64/i386 difference.  I recompiled
> > samba3 with the exact same CFLAGS using gcc 4.2.1 (from ports) and it
> still
> > crashes on my i386 system.  I don't have an AMD64 system to test on
> > anymore.  It looks like the only difference is our hardware or perhaps
> > samba3 build config.  Which options are selected in your 'make config'
> of
> > samba?
>
> I've enabled: CUPS, UTMP and POPT
>
> How much ram do you have and what zfs sysctls did you change?
>
> Boris
>
>