ULE 2.0
Jeff Roberson
jroberson at chesapeake.net
Fri Jan 5 23:46:32 PST 2007
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:18:43 -0800 (PST)
>
> Thank you. I got following message. Sorry I don't use latest your
> sched_ule.c. If this issue was fixed, please wait a minute. I'm
> compiling latest current kernel.
You should no longer get the KASSERT. I have another patch for the
invalid priority printf. It should go away soon.
Thank you for testing.
Jeff
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
> Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing.
> (noperiph:sym0:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered.
> (noperiph:sym1:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered.
> sched_priority: invalid priority 225nice 0, ticks 46194 ftick 0 ltick 45 tick pri 45
> ad0: 78533MB <HDS728080PLAT20 PF2OA21B> at ata0-master UDMA100
> firewire0: bus manager 2
> ad1: 238475MB <I-O DATA NAKA-HDRM 2.10.8> at ata1-master UDMA100
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> I got 'invalid interactive priority' KASSERTion. Sorry I didn't
> take a note. If I reproduce it, I'll report to you.
>
> MY IMPRESSION:
> I don't know that ULE2.0 is faster than 4BSD. But I feel feathery.
> Because, on make extract in big tarball, I can use my desktop
> comfortably than 4BSD. And I can see .avi with a little stop:-)
>
> I'll continue to test ULE2.0.
>
> P.S.
> I think that 'invalid priority' message is ugly:-). Please change
> like following patch. This is cosmetic change.
>
> Index: sched_ule.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.176
> diff -u -r1.176 sched_ule.c
> --- sched_ule.c 6 Jan 2007 02:34:23 -0000 1.176
> +++ sched_ule.c 6 Jan 2007 07:12:24 -0000
> @@ -1057,9 +1057,9 @@
> if (!(pri >= PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE && pri <= PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE)) {
> static int once = 1;
> if (once) {
> - printf("sched_priority: invalid priority %d",
> + printf("sched_priority: invalid priority %d\n",
> pri);
> - printf("nice %d, ticks %d ftick %d ltick %d tick pri %d\n",
> + printf("nice %d, ticks %d, ftick %d, ltick %d, tick pri %d\n",
> td->td_proc->p_nice,
> td->td_sched->ts_ticks,
> td->td_sched->ts_ftick,
>
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list