ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
grafan at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 06:35:26 UTC 2007
On 4/10/07, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:17:16AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > >Limitations.
> > >
> > > Currently ZFS is only compiled as kernel module and is only available
> > > for i386 architecture. Amd64 should be available very soon, the other
> > > archs will come later, as we implement needed atomic operations.
> > >
> > >Missing functionality.
> > >
> > > - We don't have iSCSI target daemon in the tree, so sharing ZVOLs via
> > > iSCSI is also not supported at this point. This should be fixed in
> > > the future, we may also add support for sharing ZVOLs over ggate.
> > > - There is no support for ACLs and extended attributes.
> > > - There is no support for booting off of ZFS file system.
> > >
> > >Other than that, ZFS should be fully-functional.
> > Hi, Pawel. Thanks for the great work!
> > 1. I have an yesterday's CURRENT and I get a `kmem_map too small`
> > panic when try to copy /usr/src to ZFS partition with enabled
> > compression. (I have 512M of RAM)
> See discussion in many other emails (e.g. mine). Also cvs update.
> > 2. I've tried snapshots. Seems that all work good. I have one
> > question: .zfs directory should be invisible? I can `cd .zfs`
> > and see it's content, but may be .zfs should be visible like
> > an ufs's .snap?
> I think this is controlled by the 'snapdir' property, see p80 of the
> admin guide.
Isn't that default 'hidden' ?
More information about the freebsd-current