ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.

[banshee]

	Hello, that is great news! But is it possible to use zfs + gbde?

	I have the following configuration:

	rc.conf:
	gbde_autoattach_all="yes"
	gbde_devices="ad0s1g"

	fstab:
	/dev/ad0s1g.bde         /home           ufs     rw       2       2

	So, i have to just type a passphrase at boot time, and in this case, zfs must be on ad0s1g.bde?

On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:07:03AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:53:12PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > fzap_upgrade() changes type from 'zap_micro' to 'zap_fat' and union is
> > used for this (see
> > sys/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zap_impl.h), that's why we
> > see this trash:
> > 
> > zap_num_entries_mtx = {lock_object = {lo_name = 0x70000 <Address 0x70000 out of bounds>,
> > lo_type = 0x0, lo_flags = 2155822976, lo_witness_data = {lod_list = {stqe_next = 0x0},
> > lod_witness = 0x0}}, sx_lock = 1, sx_recurse = 0},
> > 
> > I already use kmem_zalloc() (note _z_) for zap allocation in
> > zap_micro.c, so Max is right, that we have to clear this structure here.
> > 
> > I'm quite tired of tracking such problems, because our mechanism for
> > detecting already initialized locks is too simple (based on one bit), so
> > I'd prefer to improve it, or just add bzero() to mutex_init().
> 
> I just committed a fix. Now I do 13 bits check for already initialized
> locks detection instead of standard 1 bit check. Could you repeat your
> test?
> 
> -- 
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
> pjd at FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
> FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!



-- 

        Contra vim mortis, non est medicaments...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 825 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20070409/b3186d3f/attachment.pgp