Comments on the KSE option
Daniel Eischen
deischen at freebsd.org
Sun Oct 29 13:52:30 UTC 2006
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Scott Long wrote:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>> Actually, that's not quite true. I assume you know the thing you
>> left out: system scope threads compete against all the other
>> system scope threads in the system (from all applications, not
>> just within one application).
>>
>
> All this debate about the merits of process scope threads and fair
> scheduling is great. But tell me, who was working on making this stuff
> work well quickly and reliably (i.e. work well)? No one! I don't care
> what AIX or Solaris or what else may or may not have done, who was making
> this work well for FreeBSD? Having a slow a thread subsystem is
> a serious detriment, no matter how nice and flexible it looks on paper.
Process scope threads work well in libpthread. System scope
threads work well and fast in libthr. I think most people's
concept of "fast" as applied to process scope threads doesn't
quite mesh well with the fact that process scheduling is fair.
--
DE
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list