Some interesting plots
Randall Stewart
rrs at cisco.com
Sun Oct 1 06:13:40 PDT 2006
Pyun:
Nope, the test is between em1 <----> em0
The only way the msk0 would be used is in the
event of loss..via a t3 timeout... and there
are no timeouts that happen in this plot.
R
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 01:29:37PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote:
> > All:
> >
> > As you all may know I have been working on getting SCTP
> > into Current..
> >
> > I have been, of late, trying to tweak things to get
> > the BEST performance out of the implementation...
> >
> > I have moved my testing off between two 7.0 machines.. same
> > code base on each updated Sep 25.
> >
> > One is a 2.8Gig Dell SC1600 Xeon.. (hyper threaded CPU).
> > The other is a P4D (2.8Gig .. slightly faster, true dual
> > processor machine).
> >
> > They are connected by two intel EM server cards like so:
> >
> >
> > +----+ +----+
> > 1 | em1 <---------------------> em0 | 2
> > | em0 <-----locallan--------> msk0|
> > | dc0 <-Direct Inet |
> > +----+ +-----+
> >
> >
> > em1 has 10.1.2.12 em0 10.1.2.21
> > em0 has 10.1.1.12 msk0 10.1.1.21
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > One other note, I see TCP is only getting 250Meg or so on the
> > same test (It can run either).. now it used to get close to
> > the full pipe (Gigbit).. so is there some issue with the new code
> > that was recently submitted?
> >
>
> I'm not sure but it seems that you've used experimental msk(4) on
> CURRENT. ATM msk(4) has Rx performance issue. So if you get very
> poor receive performance it would be msk(4) issue.
>
--
Randall Stewart
NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc.
803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222 (cell)
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list