FreeBSD's embedded agenda

[Paul Allen]

>From Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk>, Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:10:02PM +0200:
> In message <20060525184618.GC28128 at groat.ugcs.caltech.edu>, Paul Allen writes:
> 
> >Erase cycles are often 1ms in duration.
> 
> ... Which is pretty trivial compared to the seek and latency of a
> rotating disc.
Sure to do 'one of them', but the part of the message you clipped
involved the assertion that fragmentation is free.  It isn't, you have
to do the erase cycle block-by-block, each one sequentially taking
1ms to complete.  Sure you can use flash with large block-sizes but
then you have to rewrite-out the entire block out after the erase,
and writing takes time too--not to mention negatively impacting
filesystem stability.

And each erase is counts against the cycle-life of the flash.

The trade-offs are not trivial and starting with the assertion 
"fragmentation is free" is  begging the question.