FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
Rostislav Krasny
rosti.bsd at gmail.com
Fri May 19 02:59:14 PDT 2006
On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:05:07 +0800
David Xu <davidxu at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Friday 19 May 2006 09:10, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>
> > Ok. What should I do before adding the above #ifdef's? Is it enough to
> > change following files only?
> >
> > src/sys/conf/options
> I think they are sys/conf/options.i386 and sys/conf/options.amd64
Ok, then should I also change sys/conf/options.pc98 ?
I don't know much about the PC98. What processors there are in use?
> > src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC
> > src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES
> > src/sys/i386/conf/PAE
> > src/sys/i386/conf/SMP
> > src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> > src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES
> > src/sys/amd64/conf/SMP
> >
> I think modifying GENERIC and NOTES is enough.
Then PAE and SMP kernels will be vulnerable on AMD by default?
> > > but I would call it BUG_FXSAVE like Linux's select()
> > > changed timeout value which only added incompatibility rather than
> > > advantage.
> >
> > I don't know about Linux's select() but according to what I've seen on
> > their "7466f9e72dac13452d871a3fb72fc7bd9c93c864" commit they use
> > X86_FEATURE_FXSAVE_LEAK. What do you think about FXSAVE_LEAK instead of
> > BUG_FXSAVE?
>
> I have no objection.
Ok, I'll use FXSAVE_LEAK.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list