memory leak in free()

Kostik Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com
Thu Jun 15 02:25:22 UTC 2006


On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:27:42PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:58:46PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>And any such patch would have to have a knob that defaulted to keeping
> >>overcommit on anyway. :-)
> >
> >Ha ! Exactly. My patch has such knob :).
> >Shameless plug: http://kostikbel.narod.ru/overcommit
> >
> >Testing the patch on recent CURRENT, I did notice that jemalloc
> >really likes the swap :).
> 
> You're saying that jemalloc uses a lot of *reserved* swap space, right? 
>  That's different than actually causing a lot of swapping, and 
> something that is of no concern, IMO.
Yes, absolutely.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20060615/6d51fd0a/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list