weird limitation on the system's binutils
John Baldwin
jhb at freebsd.org
Fri Jul 7 21:11:29 UTC 2006
On Friday 07 July 2006 15:55, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> середа 05 липень 2006 12:18, Robert Watson написав:
> > Perhaps the world has changed since that time, but those sound like
> > pretty good reasons to me. So these are my recollections, but since I'm
> > not an expert in our toolchain bits, I could be off in the woods
somewhere.
>
> Can we, perhaps start small and make the libiberty piece centrally available
> (and of the most recent version)?
>
> There is even a port of (devel/gnulibiberty), which its maintainer (CC-ed),
> I'm sure, will be glad to see obsoleted...
>
> We are currently building it four times:
>
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/libiberty.a
> /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a
> /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/libiberty.a
>
> And installing none...
>
> Halving that, and installing the result to be usable by ports would be a
> decent improvement, would not it?
Only if it doesn't suffer from all the same problems as libbfd.a.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list