kernel thread as real threads..

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Thu Jan 19 22:19:57 PST 2006


On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:12:58PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:

> >What about that threads don't show CPU usage or accumulate CPU time?
> >This is annoying enough for user threads but would be a pretty serious
> >usability limitation if it happened for kernel threads too.
> >
> >Kris
> > 
> >
> 
> the example I showed was the 'ps' from ddb which of course doesn't show 
> any stats anyhow.

Yeah, I know that, but they're also not displayed in ps(1) or top(1),
etc.

Kris

> Well, stats are collected. It is just a case of getting them out and 
> displayed..
> It's kind of meaningless in KSE type threads but for libthr and kernel 
> threads it would have meaning.
> 
> Anynow I just want to see what it takes to not have 40 extra proc 
> structs hanging around.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20060120/70ee11fb/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list