Portsnap is now in the base system
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Tue Jan 17 04:36:33 PST 2006
Jeremy Messenger <mezz7 at cox.net> wrote:
>>>> Is there an utility (cvsup-replacement) like this for base system
>>>> sources ?
>>> See csup: http://mu.org/~mux/csup.html. But it's not ready yet.
csup is a rewrite of cvsup in C. So it's not a replacement like portsnap is,
it's just a different implementation of the same procedure.
>> Why would one want to replace cvsup? It works great!
> You won't be asking that kind of question if you read there in the
> second paragraph. ;-)
I use both. For *me* the main reason to use portsnap was, that it is able to
fetch updates if the only way to get something from the outside is http
(e.g. via a caching proxy). This doesn't matter at home (where I use both:
portsnap to update where I don't need to modify the ports collection, and
cvsup+cvs for ports collection where I make changes). None of those reasons
where outlined in the (removed) paragraph. So I think the question is valid.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
God is a polytheist.
More information about the freebsd-current