Candidates for inclusion in DEFAULTS

Matt Emmerton matt at
Sun Jan 1 22:52:10 PST 2006

Just looking through the kernel code, and there are many strong warnings (in
NOTES, GENERIC and various bits of code) that strongly advise *not* removing
COMPAT_43 from the kernel config.

In fact, doing so causes lots of things to break, especially the

That said, would COMPAT_43 (and possibly COMPAT_FREEBSD4 and
COMPAT_FREEBSD5) be good candidates to put in DEFAULTS -- at least on i386?

Matt Emmerton

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list