RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module

[Scott Long]

Coleman Kane wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:13:05PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:11:02PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
>>
>>>Sounds good to me. In the event that you want to build this statically
>>>into the kernel, doesn't the option still need to be available,
>>>or are we talking about a device tdfxlinux ?
>>
>>It was exactly my point, too: the TDFX_LINUX option has to be there
>>so that people still can compile device tdfx with Linux support into
>>the main kernel file.
> 
> 
> Not to mention so that they can omit said functionality if it is not
> desired. I believe that the kmod by default compiles this in though.
> 
> 
>>-- 
>>Yar

Ok, I envisioned this as:

device	tdfx
device	tdfxlinux	# Optional Linux compatibility

I don't have a strong opinion on it, and I'll defer to whatever Coleman
and Yar think is most appropriate.

SCott