KDE 3.5.0 seems much chubbier than 3.4.2

[Daniel O'Connor]

On Friday 17 February 2006 12:31, Jason Evans wrote:
> > I can supply debugging information about it if you tell me what you need.
>
> First, can you please assure me that this is an increase in resident
> memory, rather than just virtual memory?

Hmm, I am not so sure that is the case..
I definitely had performance issues though - my system was paging a *lot* more 
than it used to.

> Can you tell me which programs are particularly bad, and if you are
> using them in any particular ways that are important to reproducing the
> high memory usage?  I don't generally use KDE, so any details you
> provide are likely to help.

Hmm, well it seems XOrg, Amarok, Kopete, Konqueror and KMail show up as big 
users.

I have a largish MP3 collection (~7000 songs) loaded into Amarok, I have set 
the number of history items in Kopete to be 250, Konqueror has about 10 tabs 
open and KMail is setup to used cached-imap with my email accounts (162 
folders, ~10000 messages)

With phkmalloc I am seeing Xorg use 110M/80M (size/res), amarok uses 93M/73M, 
Kopete uses 82M/56M, Konqueror uses 81M/68M, and KMail uses 68M/53M.

With jemalloc I saw Xorg use 213M/50M, amarok - 213M/50M, Kopete 119M/7.3M, 
Konq - 260M/67M (guessed), and KMail - 137M/51M.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20060220/1695f940/attachment.bin