reversed behavior with nsswitch.conf
Alexander Leidinger
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Sun Feb 19 04:45:47 PST 2006
Am Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:05:49 -0500
schrieb Joel Gunderson <jdgunder at purdue.edu>:
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >I haven't tested it, but someone suggested in private mail to use
> >"hosts: files [success=return] dns" (he told me this is the way linux
> >distributions are doing this) which suggests that the documented
> >default criteria in nsswitch.conf(5) doesn't work. Can you test if this
> >work-around works?
> I tried the "hosts: files [success=return] dns" in nsswitch, but it
> didn't work. I'll have to get back to you on the upgrade thing...if for
Ah, ok. One datapoint more.
> some reason the machine flips out on the update I don't have time to fix
> it before checkoffs. Plus my group members would kill me.
Don't risk your grade for this (this doesn't mean an update will break
something, but no need to "enjoy" a bad feeling when you're not sure
100% yourself).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=wl_em_to/
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list