Virtual memory consumption (both user and kernel) in modern
CURRENT
Tarasov Alexey
lexa at wincmd.ru
Fri Feb 17 01:22:58 PST 2006
Hello!
I have the same problem on my laptop. It works very slow (Pentium M 1.7
GHz). There are a lot of "can't allocate swap space" messages in
/var/log/messages.
Best regards,
Tarasov Alexey.
Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've got a relatively fresh (12-Feb-2006 14:20 UTC) CURRENT on my ASUS
> M5A notebook (CPU Pentium M 1.86GHz, 256 Mb memory), kernel config is:
>
> ftp://external.atlantis.dp.ua/FreeBSD/CURRENT/NOTEBOOK
>
> I have several questions regarding virtual memory use, both user-mode
> and kernel.
>
> 1) Is it normal that virtual memory size for almost every non-kernel
> process
> is close to 50Mb now:
>
> ftp://external.atlantis.dp.ua/FreeBSD/CURRENT/top.txt
>
> Is it miscalculation or real growth of virtual address space?
>
>
> 2) I can _trivially_ crash my box by extracting and deleting
> Openoffice.org
> distribution:
>
> cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0
> NOCLEANDEPENDS=yes make extract clean
>
> However, I can't obtain crash dump in most cases, see the picture:
>
> ftp://external.atlantis.dp.ua/FreeBSD/CURRENT/nodump.jpg
>
> Is it due to new ATA DMA dump code, or due to some other reason?
> I've never seen such dump failures before.
>
>
> 3) Once I was lucky enought to obtain a valid crash dump in this
> situation.
> Here is the backtrace:
>
> ftp://external.atlantis.dp.ua/FreeBSD/CURRENT/bt
>
> What tunables can I use to prevent this panic? Alas tuning(7) doesn't
> say anything about "mem_map too small". Is it tuning issue at all
> or a bug?
>
>
> Sincerely, Dmitry
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list