Can't link kernel after recent libalias commits?

[Paolo Pisati]

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:04:33PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Saturday 30 December 2006 22:46, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:43:21PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > > Note that this was for a kernel that uses ipfw, but not natd (ref.
> > > src/sys/conf/NOTES).
> >
> > my mistake, i'll write an entry for UPDATING.
> 
> Shouldn't it still be possible to build a kernel with IPFW but without 
> LIBALIAS?  i.e. instead of a UPDATING entry you should just wrap the 
> libalias entry points in IPFW - or am I misunderstanding what you are 
> saying?

with my last commit, LIBALIAS became mandatory for IPFW, and this adds
40kb (-O nocona) to my kernel size.

If it's really an issue, i can change it. 

P.