[HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC)

Brooks Davis brooks at one-eyed-alien.net
Wed Aug 23 14:44:07 UTC 2006


On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at Leidinger.net> writes:
> > Michael Bushkov <bushman at rsu.ru> writes:(from Tue, 22 Aug 2006
> > > So, after all, I'd prefer to leave libldap (and nss_ldap, which can
> > > also conflict with PADL's nss_ldap) as is and let users use
> > > WITHOUT_LDAP and WITHOUT_NSS_LDAP when appropriate.
> > If someone doesn't like the base system libldap, but wants the
> > nss_ldap stuff, this way will not work out. While building the base
> > system, no 3rd party libs are known to the build infrastructure.
> 
> Wrong.  It is already possible in today's tree to build the base
> system's Kerberos with OpenLDAP support using the OpenLDAP port, and
> there are similar provisions for using OpenSSL from ports.

It's also possible to build sendmail with SASL support:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html

-- Brooks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20060823/7ccd7769/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list