HEADS-UP: starting to commit linuxolator (SoC 2006) changes...
julian at elischer.org
Thu Aug 17 15:15:42 UTC 2006
Divacky Roman wrote:
>>Anyone with interest in this is free to take care of this, as long as
>>they coordinate with the people which work on the current
>>infrastructure on emulation@ regarding the userland/security stuff and
>>the kernel. Until someone stands up and shows results/progress, this
>>is scheduled to vanish in the future.
>I personally see this 3 possible ways:
>1) leave it as it is (ie. as what will be commited shortly), this means runtime
>checking for osrelease sysctl and behaving according to it
>2) introduce option LINUX_24 or something like that to make this a compile time build
>3) remove the 2.4 completely saying that "if you want 2.4 emulation downgrade fbsd as well".
>notice that this is 100% ok because linux itself doesnt support 2.4 emulation on 2.6 kernel.
I think that would be a great selling point.. especially if two
processes could run the different releases at the same time..
"even linux needs vmware to do this..".
>I would go with number 3.
More information about the freebsd-current