To compare hostap-client mode and adhoc's mode on Atheros cards.

Daniel Dvorak dandee at hellteam.net
Thu Sep 29 16:21:13 PDT 2005


Hello all,

who use wireless stuff of FreeBSD and others. :)

Have you tested and compared the infrastructure mode and the adhoc mode
anybody ?

We have 2 servers with 681 m distance. Wireless signal is about avg. RSSI
20-22 on both site.

We use on one site hostap and on the second site client, of course. Rate is
a sample rate.

The maximum bandwidth is about 1,2 MB/s in one direction.

Problem:

If we switch cards to adhoc mode on both site the speed is 10 times slower.
Nothing else has changed.

Has anybody come accross with it in the past or nowadays ?

Thank you for your attention.

Dan

P.S.: Of cource, I could provide more information if it is needed.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sam Leffler
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:29 PM
To: dandee at volny.cz
Cc: freebsd-current at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: dev.ath.0.slottime changing and why ?


ath_rate_sample is the only one to use.  It's still got some issues (John
did some fixes that are in the Linux version that I haven't backported yet)
but outperfoms the others hands down.

        Sam
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org" 



  _____  

avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Odchozi zprava cista. 


Virova databaze (VPS): 0539-2, 29.09.2005
Testovano: 30.9.2005 1:21:09
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.





More information about the freebsd-current mailing list