To compare hostap-client mode and adhoc's mode on Atheros cards.
dandee at hellteam.net
Thu Sep 29 16:21:13 PDT 2005
who use wireless stuff of FreeBSD and others. :)
Have you tested and compared the infrastructure mode and the adhoc mode
We have 2 servers with 681 m distance. Wireless signal is about avg. RSSI
20-22 on both site.
We use on one site hostap and on the second site client, of course. Rate is
a sample rate.
The maximum bandwidth is about 1,2 MB/s in one direction.
If we switch cards to adhoc mode on both site the speed is 10 times slower.
Nothing else has changed.
Has anybody come accross with it in the past or nowadays ?
Thank you for your attention.
P.S.: Of cource, I could provide more information if it is needed.
From: owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sam Leffler
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:29 PM
To: dandee at volny.cz
Cc: freebsd-current at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: dev.ath.0.slottime changing and why ?
ath_rate_sample is the only one to use. It's still got some issues (John
did some fixes that are in the Linux version that I haven't backported yet)
but outperfoms the others hands down.
freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Odchozi zprava cista.
Virova databaze (VPS): 0539-2, 29.09.2005
Testovano: 30.9.2005 1:21:09
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
More information about the freebsd-current