Negative disc usage from /bin/df 6.0-BETA5
Julian H. Stacey
jhs at flat.berklix.net
Tue Sep 27 13:42:03 PDT 2005
--------
Kris Kennaway wrote:
(& similar private mail from Rene L. thanks to both)
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Julian Stacey wrote:
> > 6.0-BETA5 /bin/df
> > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> > /dev/ad0s4a 253678 91884 141500 39% /
> > devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev
> > /dev/ad0s4d 253678 141418 91966 61% /var
> > /dev/ad0s4e 253678 -272 233656 -0% /tmp
> > /dev/ad0s4f 5421722 3255960 1732026 65% /usr
> >=20
> > 108% is plausible when eg root has eaten most of the reserve allowed by=
> =20
> > eg 'newfs -m 10', but ... Negative disc usage just doesnt look right !
>
> umount and fsck..you probably have some fs corruption.
Yes, thanks,
FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? yes
First I was just so amused to see negative space used (& had wondered
about ratio of int to unsigned usage in the FS etc).
--
Julian Stacey. Consultant Unix Net & Sys. Eng., Munich. http://berklix.com
Mail Ascii not HTML. Ihr Rauch = meine allergischen Kopfschmerzen.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list