4BSD/ULE numbers...

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Mon Sep 26 10:47:40 PDT 2005

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:47:27PM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Hello,
> I tried ULE with BETA5 and for me it felt a bit sluggish when making ports.
> So I did some "realworld" simulation and compared 4BSD/ULE to see what 
> numbers tell me. And the prooved my feeling right.
> It seems that ULE is priorizing nice a little higher, but in general the 
> output of the 4 BSD machine is higher and finishing the tests took not so 
> long as with ULE, especially the "make configure" differs horribly.

That's consistent with my testing.  ULE seems a bit more stable now in
6.0 (except on my large SMP machines, which reboot spontaneously under
moderate load), but it doesn't perform as well as 4BSD under real
application workloads.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20050926/4e9e8819/attachment.bin

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list