low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule

[Kris Kennaway]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:12:38PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> 
> > Joseph Koshy wrote:
> > 
> > > What happens if you use a kernel with 'options NO_ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES' ?
> > 
> > I'll try this and respond back
> > 
> 
> Hmm, that made it more worse

What about using schedgraph as I suggested previously?

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20050915/193f7374/attachment.bin