low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule
lehmann at ans-netz.de
Wed Sep 14 13:20:00 PDT 2005
Scott Long wrote:
> Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > Any idea where the 30MB/sec drawback comes from and if I missed sth.?
> > I mean why there are 30MB/s more or less is worth to think about imho.
> Indeed. This definitely warrants much more testing and investigation.
> My best guess is that ULE is allowing the uio copies of the data between
> kernel and userland to complete with fewer interruptions. It could also
> be better about keeping the threads from ping-ponging between CPUs. Can
> you retest with different block sizes, ranging from 4k to 1m?
btw. the RAID strip size is 64k
More information about the freebsd-current