Regression in device ath between BETA5 and RC1?
Boris Samorodov
bsam at ipt.ru
Fri Oct 21 06:28:19 PDT 2005
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:03:46 -0600 (MDT) M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20051020232308.GA77950 at xor.obsecurity.org>
> Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> writes:
> : On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
> : > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> : > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:11:41PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
> : > >
> : > >
> : > >>I was seeing this behavior a lot on 5.2.1, 5.3, and, IIRC, 5.4.
> : > >>Responsiveness was so poor as to make remote SSH sessions unusable.
> : > >>When I installed -CURRENT then RELENG_6, then the NIC started performing
> : > >>beautifully. Very stable and consistent. Now, with yesterday's cvsup'd
> : > >>to RC1, the NIC/driver is performing poorly again.
> : > >
> : > >
> : > >Go back to the previous version to verify it's not environmental or
> : > >some other problem than a regression in FreeBSD.
> : > >
> : > Sure, can you tell me what tag to use in my supfile? Right now I have:
> : >
> : > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
> :
> : Use a date instead of a tag (see the cvsup docs).
> *default release=cvs date=2005.10.10.12.23.45
> and try to find where, since June, the divergence of performance was.
> We branched RELENG_6 in June, and there's been much merged from head
> back into RELENG_6.
>From the first letter of this thread: "Today I cvsup'd from BETA5 to
RC1 and have noticed..." When did BETA-5 appeared? This can narrow
down the search.
WBR
--
bsam
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list