Filesystem panic - one hd inaccessable under 6-STABLE

[Brian Fundakowski Feldman]

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:51:33PM +0100, Jochen Gensch wrote:
> Am Freitag 04 November 2005 22:27 schrieb Bernd Walter:
> 
> > If you have the filesystem on a slice (e.g. da0s1) and not a partition
> > (e.g. da0s1e) it shouldn't be an UFS one.
> 
> I simply use the whole harddrive without subdividing partitions. Why souldn't 
> that slice be ufs?
> 
> 
> > Then check with disklabel da0s1 what partitions you have and use the
> > 4.2BSD ones.
> 
> disklabel da0s1
> # /dev/da0s1:
> 8 partitions:
> #        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
>   c: 320159322        0    unused        0     0         # "raw" part, don't 
> edit
> 
> 
> As you can see, nothing left. However I don't know what it looked like before. 
> I was able to mount da0s1 directly, so maybe there wasn't any partition 
> anyway since I used the entire disk at once (I'm not that used to filesystem 
> issues)?

Well then da0s1 wouldn't have a disklabel.  So try fsck_ufs -b 160 on
/dev/da0s1 itself?

-- 
Brian Fundakowski Feldman                           \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\
  <> green at FreeBSD.org                               \  The Power to Serve! \
 Opinions expressed are my own.                       \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\