md (file backed) performance [Was: Re: unionfs 5.4]

[Kris Kennaway]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:03:05AM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:

> > I can't MFC this for 5.4, it requires too much of the new vfs architecture
> > to properly function.  I'll mail re@ to see what their opinion is for 5.5.
> 
> Oic. I haven't tracked -current since christmas so I'd like to ask if you know 
> anything new about file backed md performance.
> I wanted to use that for jail systems but performance was really bad.
> Does your great work also improve md behaviour?

A few months ago alc made some commits which improved md performance
significantly.

Kris

--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe at alum.mit.edu>